Attempted Trump Assassination - Oddities

Post 105

"Whenever the people need a hero we shall supply him" — Albert Pike, 33rd Degree Freemason                       

BLUF: Was the attempted Trump assassination nothing more than a bungled attempt by some mentally unhealthy young man? Or was this part of a greater play, designed to empower Trump for his eventual presidential win?

---

Introduction:

Former President Donald Trump narrowly escaped an assassination attempt during a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024. The assailant, Thomas Matthew Crooks, was fatally shot by Secret Service agents. Trump suffered a minor injury to his right ear but is said to be in stable condition. Tragically, the incident claimed the life of one bystander and left two others severely wounded. The weapon used in the attack was reported to be an AR-15. Reports on Crooks' political affiliation are conflicting, though many mainstream media outlets now indicate he was a registered Republican.

Upon further consideration of the details of the event, several oddities arise. This article will touch upon these oddities, attempting to address the quirks, to better answer the questions: Was this assassination attempt simply a 20-year old lone gunman? or Was this a purposefully planned event and therefore part of a greater play?

---

Timeline of Events:

Here’s a timeline of the events leading up to and during the assassination attempt on former President Donald Trump at his rally in Butler, Pennsylvania - based off MSM, Alternative Media and Social Media reporting:

1:00 PM: Doors to the rally site at Butler Farm Show open, with thousands of attendees arriving throughout the afternoon.

5:00 PM: Trump is scheduled to begin speaking but is delayed.

6:03 PM: Trump takes the stage to “God Bless the USA” and greets the crowd.

6:05 PM: Trump starts his speech, commenting on the crowd size and discussing various topics.

6:10 PM: Trump pivots to his right to discuss immigration statistics.

6:11 PM: The shooter fires multiple shots towards the stage. Trump grabs his right ear and drops to the ground.

6:12 PM: Secret Service agents jump on top of Trump and escort him off stage into a vehicle.

6:14 PM: Trump’s motorcade leaves the fairgrounds surrounded by law enforcement vehicles.

6:42 PM: The Secret Service issues a statement confirming the incident and that Trump is safe.

7:49 PM: Secret Service Spokesman Anthony Guglielmi confirms the shooter was neutralized and that one spectator was killed and two others were critically injured.

8:13 PM: President Biden condemns the shooting and expresses his intent to speak with Trump.

8:42 PM: Trump posts on Truth Social confirming he was shot and describing the incident.

12:55 AM: “Attempted Trump Assassination,” Wikipedia page is indexed and saved by Archive.org

[Analyst note: initial reports stated Trump was shot at 6:13 pm. From an occultist perspective this is relevant, as the number 13 holds great meaning to Free Masons. It signifies unity among Masons, among other things. July, 13 at 6:13pm gives us three 13s, remember 7/13 and 6:13 (6+7 = 13), 13,13,13. Butler, PA is exactly 33 miles from Pittsburgh, PA, according to Google. The number 33 is a powerful and important number for Freemasonry.]

---

Alleged Shooter - Thomas Mathew Crooks:

The shooter has been identified by MSM as Thomas Mathew Crooks of Bethel Park, PA.

A voter-registration record showed that Mr. Crooks was registered as a Republican, though federal campaign-finance records show he donated $15 to the Progressive Turnout Project, a liberal voter turnout group, through the Democratic donation platform ActBlue in January 2021.

A voter-registration record showed that Mr. Crooks was registered as a Republican, though federal campaign-finance records show he donated $15 to the Progressive Turnout Project, a liberal voter turnout group, through the Democratic donation platform ActBlue in January 2021.

The below video is a supposed video circulating on multiple social media platforms, allegedly of Thomas Mathew Crooks, who ends with the words: “…and guess what, you’ve got the wrong guy.”

There are a handful of alternative media sites that have postulated that Maxwell Yearick was the shooter. There are some social media posts that are circulating the image below. A quick image analysis indicates that the ear lobes are different, and there are no ear gauges or ear holes from gauges in the photo of the deceased or in the captured photo from below.

Interestingly, the NY Post first described the shooter as a Chinese male that was much further from the event “hundred of yards away.”

This was corrected by the NY Post to state it was identified as only a white male.

QUESTIONS:

1. Was there more than one shooter?

2. Did MSM make a mistake reporting the shooter Chinese?

3. Did the media make a mistake stating the shooter was hundreds of yards away?

ANSWERS:

1. At this time there appears to only have been gunfire from the roof of the shooter and the sniper team.

2. Likely. Early eye witness reporting is often atrocious.

3. See number two.

CONCLUSIONS:

Was the pictured deceased, named by MSM as Thomas Mathew Crooks, the shooter? It appears that way. Regarding his political affiliation, there are two conflicting elements of information, therefore, it is inconclusive. Furthermore, I have been unable to find any social media on this person, which is odd. Most youth have some sort of social media presence.

---

Secret Service Perimeter:

The security perimeter for presidential speaking events is highly detailed and involves multiple layers of protection to ensure the safety of the president. Here are some typical aspects of the security perimeter:

Outer Perimeter: This is usually established several blocks away from the venue where the president will be speaking. It is manned by uniformed law enforcement officers who control access points and conduct thorough screenings of vehicles and individuals entering the area.

Inner Perimeter: Closer to the venue, typically within 100 meters, the inner perimeter is established with barriers such as fencing or concrete barriers. This area is heavily guarded by both uniformed and plainclothes officers who are trained in crowd control and threat assessment.

Venue Security: Inside the venue, there are additional layers of security, including magnetometers (metal detectors) and bag checks for everyone entering. Secret Service agents, often in plainclothes, are dispersed throughout the venue to monitor the crowd and respond to any potential threats.

Roof Coverage: Nearby roofs within approximately 200 meters of the venue are a critical area of concern for security personnel. To mitigate any potential threats from elevated positions, rooftops are typically secured and monitored by snipers or surveillance teams. This ensures that no unauthorized individuals can use rooftops as vantage points for attacks or disruptions.

Airspace Security: Depending on the location, airspace over the venue may be restricted during the event. This is enforced by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and coordinated with military and law enforcement aircraft to prevent any unauthorized aircraft from entering the area.

Emergency Response Teams: Specialized units such as SWAT teams, bomb squads, and medical personnel are on standby nearby to respond immediately in case of emergencies.

Overall, the security perimeter for presidential speaking events is meticulously planned and executed to provide comprehensive protection against various potential threats, including those from elevated positions such as nearby rooftops.

HEADLINES OF THREATS AGAINST TRUMP:

ENHANCED COVERAGE WHEN CREDIBLE THREATS:

When threats are made against the president, the security measures for speaking events are typically heightened and adjusted to address specific risks. Here’s how the security perimeter may change in response to threats:

Increased Personnel: More law enforcement officers, Secret Service agents, and possibly military personnel may be deployed to augment the security detail. This includes additional personnel on the ground and on rooftops to enhance surveillance and response capabilities.

Expanded Perimeters: The outer and inner perimeters may be extended further out from the venue to create a larger buffer zone. This helps to minimize the risk of threats reaching the immediate vicinity of the president.

Enhanced Screening: Security screenings at entry points become more stringent. There may be more thorough searches of individuals, vehicles, and belongings to detect any prohibited items or potential threats.

Rooftop Security: Rooftop coverage within a wider radius (beyond 200 meters) may be intensified. This can involve more snipers or surveillance teams positioned strategically to monitor a broader area and deter any attempts from elevated positions.

Airspace Restrictions: Restrictions on airspace around the venue may be more restrictive or extended for a longer duration. This ensures that unauthorized aircraft are prevented from entering the restricted area during the event.

Emergency Response Readiness: Emergency response teams are placed on higher alert with quicker response times. Specialized units are positioned closer to the venue to swiftly address any threats or incidents that may arise.

Intelligence Monitoring: There is heightened monitoring of intelligence and threat assessments leading up to and during the event. Law enforcement agencies and the Secret Service collaborate closely to gather and analyze information, enabling preemptive action if necessary.

Coordination with Local Authorities: Increased coordination with local law enforcement, emergency services, and municipal authorities ensures a seamless and coordinated response to any security challenges.

Overall, threats against the president prompt a proactive adjustment of security protocols to ensure the safety and protection of the president, dignitaries, attendees, and the general public attending the speaking event. The goal is to mitigate risks and swiftly respond to any potential threats or incidents.

QUESTIONS:

1. Was this a normal or enhanced security event?

2. If this was a normal security event, were there no credible threats against Trump?

3. Does one of the most contentious and politically divisive candidates get more death threats? More security coverage?

4. Do thousands of online Twitter threats count toward a Secret Service enhanced security detail?

5. Do past assassination attempts against a candidate count toward an overall threat assessment and security response?

6. If there are a limited number of rooftops, do they still only secure one rooftop?

7. If there is only one rooftop with a clear and good line of sight, is this normally left unmanned?

8. How easy is it to smuggle an AR-15 into the outer or middle security perimeter?

POSSIBLE ANSWERS:

1. Unknown, however a lack of military personnel, and a lack of coverage on one of the nearby roofs (where the shooter was), indicates this wasn’t an enhanced security event.

2. According to MSM and Alternative Media, there have been threats made against Trump. This shouldn’t be surprising, he’s a highly contentious figure. But, ultimately we will likely never know.

3. One would assume so, but again, unknown.

4. If the answer to number one is accurate, then apparently not.

5. There was a documented attempted assassination against Trump in 2016. There was more than one arrest more recently of people who have made threats or taken steps toward attempting to take Trump’s life. If the answer to number one is correct, apparently this isn’t taken into account.

6. It appears only one rooftop was secured, which seems odd and different than past events.

7. This appears to be an oddity that is contrary to many past events and possibly SOP.

8. Unknown.

CONCLUSIONS:

The oddities that stands out the most are related to Secret Service’s posture. As several past attempts and arrests have been made in relation to threats against Trump AND active threats appear to be prolific, to include from potential state actors, as Iran has a valid reason to wish to kill Trump, it seems odd that the Secret Service would opt for an un-enhanced security detail. At the least, why wouldn’t they man one of the nearest roofs with a direct line-of-sight to the presidential podium? This feels like such an obvious and easy oversight.

---

How Far Away Was the Shooter:

Maps, media reports, and eyes witness accounts, along with some basic math (see below) seem to put the shooter at approximately 150 yards (127 meters or 450 feet). This isn’t a difficult shot for someone moderately trained with a rifle.

SOME MATH:

The speed of sound varies with ambient conditions but is generally around 1,125 feet per second (fps). A typical 5.56 rifle round travels at approximately 2,500 fps from a standard 16-inch rifle barrel, although its speed decreases as it travels.

Given that the rifle used in the recent assassination attempt on #Trump was likely a semi-automatic (the norm for an AR-15), the barrel length was likely 16 inches or up to 18 inches at most (again the norm for non-tax stamp AR-15).

When analyzing audio recordings close to the point of impact, the sound of the bullet hitting its target is heard first, followed by the report of the rifle shot. The time between these two events provides an estimate of the shooter's distance.

In this case, audio analysis indicates a 0.22-second delay between the impact sound and the rifle report (verified independently). Using the formula for distance calculation (distance = speed × time), this corresponds to approximately 450 feet.

Further breakdown:

1. The bullet would travel 450 feet in about 0.18 seconds.

2. The sound of the rifle shot would travel 450 feet in approximately 0.4 seconds.

3. The difference between these times (0.22 seconds) matches the audio recording.

Conclusion: The shooter was approximately 450 feet away, equivalent to about 1.5 football fields.

QUESTIONS:

1. Was the shooter trained?

2. If he wasn’t trained, why take a shot?

3. Was the shooter within the security perimeter?

4. How did the shooter get into the security perimeter undetected?

POSSIBLE ANSWERS:

1. Unknown. Based on his age, lack of law enforcement, or military background, with possible Democratic donations and ties, and being a math whiz, and the fact that he missed (predicated on a legitimate shooting that took place), then no - he wasn’t trained.

2. Ignorance? Hollywood programming, thought shooting was easier? Nerves the day of. Perhaps trained and just got nervous for the real event.

3. Based of the statements of the eye witness who saw the shooter climb up the building with a rifle, as well as being within 450 feet of the president, one would assume he was within one of the security perimeters.

4. Explosives found in the suspects car, indicate he had taken a car to the rally. He could have smuggled it in a vehicle that wasn’t well checked, as he wouldn’t have appeared like a typical threat to law enforcement. It is odd for a non-military trained, Democrat donating young man to have explosives, unless they were low yield fireworks, or easily attainable tannerite.

CONCLUSIONS:

The greatest conclusion drawn from this section is that the shooter wasn’t too far from the president, and may well have been within the Secret Service security perimeter. Once more, the biggest failing appears to be with the overall security posture.

---

Sniper Response:

Below is a video of the snipers on the roof. Notice from the picture below, they are running suppressed (“silencers” on their rifles). The sound in the video doesn’t appear to be from a suppressed rifle, and therefore one can assume it was from the shooter, not the sniper. Furthermore, the sniper closest to the perspective of the cameraman is moving his barrel wildly, possibly worried about incoming rounds, as this would be a display of terrible muzzle control in a trained sniper if he were firing shots.

---

Warning:

QUESTIONS:

1. Is this gentleman legitimate?

2. Why didn’t he warn bystanders or seek cover?

3. Why haven’t other witnessed verified this man’s story?

4. Did Secret Service see him?

5. Did the police relay his warning?

6. If the police didn’t relay his warning? Why not?

7. Was this gentlemen in the secured perimeter?

8. Is MSM covering this man’s statements?

POSSIBLE ANSWERS:

1. There are possible indications of deception in his body language. This man appears to believe what he his saying, as his body language is mostly congruent with his statements. His statements, however, when answering the question about the shooter having a rifle were partially incongruent. The man appears to both nod and shake his head in negation, and odd movement for an affirmative statement. [Interrogator’s note: it is hard to assess without more of a baseline to draw from.]

2. It’s possible he was so concerned with Trump, or so unaware that the threat could be real, that he never paused to consider his safety or that of those around him. Inconclusive.

3. Either others didn’t see what he saw, the man is outright lying or a plant, or everyone else is fearful or remarking on what they witnessed. Inconclusive.

4. Unknown, but one would hope a red headed man waving his hands frantically would have attracted the attention of law enforcement. It seems odd that they would have missed that.

5. The fact that Secret Service only secured the president after shots were fired indicates that they most likely didn’t relay the message. The alternative, which is far less likely, is that the entire detail (or a large segment) was in on a grand conspiracy to assassinate Trump, this stretches credulity.

6. It’s possible the police simply didn’t believe the man. It’s possible they were fed misinformation and told the man on the roof was one of theirs, and therefore ignored the warning. It could also simply be incompetence.

7. The man had a direct view of Secret Service snipers on the roof, according to his statement, and warned nearby police. Both indicate he was within a security perimeter.

8. MSM has only given cursory coverage of this man. They stated someone warned law enforcement, but failed to state what the man said, or the delay between his warning and any actions taken.

CONCLUSIONS:

As so many of these questions hinge on the eye-witness testimony of a single guy with a beer in his hands, that appears to display at least one incongruent behavioral cluster, it is hard to consider this a hard line of evidence. Eye witness testimony is one of the weakest forms of testimony in court, yet psychologically, it carries a lot of weight with a jury. Eye witness testimony also works well for psychological operations.

---

Trump’s Response and Coverage:

Experiencing being grazed by a bullet or shot at for the first time can be a highly traumatic and stressful event for most, eliciting a range of physical and emotional responses. Here are some typical responses and visible indicators:

Immediate Shock and Disbelief: Individuals often experience an initial shock and disbelief that they have been shot at or grazed by a bullet. This can lead to a surge of adrenaline and a heightened state of alertness.

Emotional Responses: Emotionally, individuals may experience a range of feelings such as fear, anxiety, anger, or relief (if the injury is minor). The shock of the incident and the realization of mortality can be profound.

Physical Reaction: Physically, some individuals may experience shaking, trembling, or nausea as a result of the adrenaline rush and stress response triggered by the event.

In summary, being grazed by a bullet or shot at for the first time can result in a mix of physical and emotional reactions. The immediate response often involves shock, pain, visible signs of injury like bleeding and abrasions, and a heightened emotional state. Seeking medical attention is crucial to address the physical injury and manage the psychological impact of such a traumatic event.

TRUMP’S RESPONSE:

Trump appeared remarkably calm for having been shot at. He apparently asked about his shoe(s) and had the wherewithal to tell the agents to pause, which they did, and stick a fist into the air and yell “fight.” This is an interesting psychological response to being shot and shot at. It is an unusual response. It did make for an excellent photo and good coverage.

QUESTIONS:

1. Who is the man in the audience behind Trump with a dark top hat and blazer? What was he shouting? Did Trump react to his shout?

2. Why did so few people duck for cover?

3. Are any of the people behind Trump plants?

POSSIBLE ANSWERS:

1. Unknown who he is. Unknown what he said. Trump appears to react immediately afterward, and tells Secret Service to wait, then thrusts his fist into the air.

2. The general population (non-military) typically have terrible responses to emergency incidents as they have no experiences to draw upon, and instead get stuck in an OODA loop, or copy those around them.

3. Unknown.

CONCLUSIONS:

It’s hard to draw any solid conclusions from the above. Trump’s response does seem atypical. The man behind Trump does shout something and Trump shortly thereafter responds. This could be coincidental, or it could be a plant reminding Trump to pause for his victory moment, fist in the air and shout of defiance.

---

Ear Wound:

If an ear is grazed by a .223 round (which is a common caliber for rifles), the appearance and symptoms would depend on several factors including the angle of impact, the velocity of the bullet, and whether the bullet actually made contact with the ear or nearby.

Appearance:

• Visible Injury: There would likely be a visible abrasion or laceration on the ear where the bullet grazed. The skin might appear torn, with potentially jagged edges depending on the trajectory of the bullet.

• Bleeding: There could be bleeding from the grazed area. The amount of bleeding would depend on the severity of the graze and the presence of any underlying blood vessels that were affected.

• Tissue Damage: A .223 round can cause significant tissue damage even from a graze due to its high velocity. The immediate area around the graze might appear swollen and inflamed.

Symptoms:

• Pain: The individual would experience pain at the site of the graze. The pain can range from mild to severe depending on the depth of the graze and whether nerve endings were affected.

• Shock and Adrenaline Response: There would likely be an immediate shock reaction due to the sudden and traumatic nature of the incident. Adrenaline levels would spike, causing a heightened state of alertness and anxiety.

• Tinnitus: There might be ringing in the ear (tinnitus) if the bullet's passage near the ear caused a sudden pressure change or trauma to the ear canal.

• Hearing Impairment: Depending on the proximity of the graze to the ear canal and inner ear structures, there could be temporary or permanent hearing impairment. This would typically be assessed by medical professionals.

• Emotional Response: The individual may experience fear, anxiety, or panic following such an incident. Psychological support may be needed to address the trauma associated with being shot at or grazed.

QUESTIONS:

1. Does the trajectory of the round and Trump’s head turned to the right make sense?

2. Trump’s right ear was turned away from the camera at the moment of the event. Is this a coincidence, or hiding a poking device or fake blood squib?

3. Trump exhibited little to no fear, is he naturally fearless?

4. Trump had the presence of mind to pump a fist and shout fight. Are these common reactions to someone just shot (presumably for the first time in their life, non-law enforcement, non-military).

5. Why so little blood on Trump’s ear?

6. Why didn’t the blood drip onto his collar?

7. Did the bullet rip a jagged line across his ear, or simply barely wing it?

8. Where did all the other rounds impact?

9. There were seven to eight rows of people crowded behind Trump. Were none hit with the several rounds fired?

10. Was Trump acting when he turned away?

POSSIBLE ANSWERS:

1. Based on satellite photos and the position of Trump and the roof, this appears to make sense.

2. Unknown.

3. Unknown.

4. This isn’t a common reaction. A response under stress, as they sayin the military, is one’s lowest level of training. Was Trump coached before and reminded in the stands? Possibly, but this ultimately is unknown.

5. Perhaps where he got hit, it just barely grazed him.

6. See answer five.

7. It’s hard to tell, but it appears a small chunk of his ear is missing.

8. Unknown. This should be investigated, but it does seem odd that with such a thick crowd, and nearly no one ducking for cover, that only one person was hit. Perhaps the shooter was just a terrible follow on shot.

9. It appears one person was hit and killed, according to media reports and an eye-witness from social media. The media hasn’t released the name of the victim at the time of this writing.

10. This is hard to say. Although Trump is listed as an actor in imdb, and has played on TV and small bit movie parts, and his turn away looked partially insincere, it is impossible to ascribe motivation and intent.

CONCLUSIONS:

All evidence indicates an injury to Trump’s ear, likely caused by a near miss from a rifle round.There is too little information to draw alternative conclusions from this section.

---

List of Oddities:

---

Multiple Prior Warnings:

Several prominent alternative media personalities, including Tucker Carlson, Tim Pool, Roger Stone, and Alex Jones, have voiced concerns and predictions about a potential assassination attempt on Donald Trump. Their statements have often been amplified within alternative media spaces, repeatedly shared and discussed.

Tucker Carlson, known for his conservative viewpoints on Fox News, has occasionally hinted at the possibility of such an event, framing it within broader discussions about political polarization and potential extremist threats.

Tim Pool, a popular commentator on YouTube known for his centrist and libertarian perspectives, has also discussed the possibility of violence against political figures, including Trump (if memory serves), especially in the context of societal tensions and radicalized factions.

Roger Stone, a longtime political consultant and associate of Trump, has publicly suggested that certain political adversaries or deep-state elements might resort to extreme measures against Trump, given their animosity towards his policies and presidency.

Alex Jones, the controversial figure behind Infowars, has frequently speculated about plots and conspiracies targeting Trump, often framing these ideas within his broader narrative of governmental corruption and globalist agendas.

These personalities' discussions around potential threats to Trump's safety could be interpreted in different ways. On one hand, they might genuinely believe that such risks exist based on their analysis of political dynamics and security threats. On the other hand, there is a concern that their statements could also be seen as priming or shaping a narrative that prepares their audience for the possibility of such an event.

By consistently discussing and amplifying these concerns, these media figures may be influencing public perception and readiness for a scenario they foresee as plausible. This can contribute to a heightened sense of tension and suspicion within their audience, potentially reinforcing existing beliefs or fears about political violence. They could also be part of a greater Information Operation Campaign. By both priming and audience for a shocking event, and setting the narrative early, less questions arise when said event transpires, as the reasons (answers) have already been provided.

QUESTIONS:

1. The main question here should be - are these sources credible? Do they have any potential connections to a hidden cabal of power brokers?

2. Why are these voices so loudly represented in alternative spaces? They literally are larger than MSM in their audience? Is this an organic event, or a purposeful information operation capturing the narrative through a contrarian lens?

POSSIBLE ANSWERS:

1. This won’t readily be answered here. Tucker Carlson’s father worked for the CIA, and Tucker worked in mainstream media - is he tied to a secret agenda, unknown. Alex Jones vies away from some topics, and hasn’t been killed like Bill Cooper (another notorious truther) - and there are symbolic references to Freemasonry on his show. Many in positions of influence appear to be tied to Freemasonry.

2. This isn’t definitive, but there are lines of evidence to indicate these are largely captured spaces and the move from MSM to alternative media has been a controlled move, partially driven by President Trump, famous for decrying MSM as “fake news.”

---

Who Now Endorses Trump:

Following the recent assassination attempt on Donald Trump, several celebrities and public figures have expressed their support for him:

Elon Musk: The CEO of Tesla and SpaceX endorsed Trump, describing him as "tough" and drawing a comparison to Theodore Roosevelt.

John Rich: The country music singer from Big & Rich tweeted about the incident, expressing his relief that Trump was okay.

Scotty McCreery: The American Idol alum shared his prayers for Trump and the country.

Josh Turner: Another country singer, Turner, sent his thoughts and prayers to Trump and the families affected by the incident.

Mike "The Situation" Sorrentino: The Jersey Shore star posted a message of support on social media, accompanied by an American flag emoji.

These reactions underscore the significant impact of the event, with many celebrities and influencers voicing their concern and solidarity.

QUESTIONS:

1. Are any of these celebrities tied to secret fraternities or groups?

2. Is this response organic or pre-planned?

3. Would a large outpouring of support by famous persons shift public opinion?

POSSIBLE ANSWERS:

1. Suffice it to say that Elon Musk has apparent ties to the occult, covered in Post 93. Furthermore, it appears most in Hollywood and the Music Industry are tied to Freemasonry or a derivation of it.

2. The speed of the responses from Elon Musk hints at this being a planned response, but ultimately intent is hard to prove, and is therefore, unknown.

3. This is very likely to happen.

CONCLUSIONS:

This event may well be the catalyst that pushes Trump into greater levels of popularity and sympathy. This is a huge boon to his campaign and would make him nigh untouchable for a spell.

---

Odd Occult References:

There are a few occult references that could be drawn from the date, the fist in the air, the signs behind Trump, and possibly from I, Pet Goat II.

Gematria Calculator:

A three-named assassin, how fitting. Running Thomas Mathew Crooks through a Gematria cipher yields a few interesting results which include: Donald Event Horizon, New Vaccine, and Tower of Babylon.

Interesting Imagery from I, Pet Goat II:

One of the twelve behind the girl in the classroom may be Trump. Take note of the hairline of the figure behind and to the left of the girl, as well as the hand position, a Freemasonic hand sign that Trump often employs, an inverted triangle.

For more on I, Pet Goat II, see:

---

---

Possible Outcomes of This Event:

Let’s put on our speculative hats and look at how this assassination may help or hurt Trump in the below hypothetical thought experiments, that take into account the recent assassination attempt along with present geopolitical challenges, inflationary challenges, and the simmering political divide the US and World faces.

Impact on Trump:

• Help: The assassination attempt could potentially rally his supporters and sympathetic voters around him. It might evoke sympathy and portray him as a resilient figure standing against adversaries. This could strengthen his base and galvanize his campaign.

• Hurt: On the other hand, some voters might blame Trump for fostering a divisive political climate that could have incited the attempt. It could also raise concerns about security and stability under his leadership, particularly if opponents paint the incident as a consequence of his rhetoric or policies.

Popularity and Mandate:

• The attempt could increase Trump's popularity among supporters who view him as a strong leader facing adversity. It might reinforce his image as a protector and leader in turbulent times, potentially bolstering his mandate if re-elected.

Historical Comparisons:

• Drawing comparisons to Teddy Roosevelt, known for his robust and forceful leadership, could resonate positively with voters who admire strength and resilience in leadership during crises.

Policy Implications - Gun Laws and Restrictions:

• The assassination attempt involving an AR-15 rifle could renew debates about gun control and lead to calls for stricter regulations, such as red flag laws (which allow temporary confiscation of firearms from individuals deemed a risk to themselves or others) or specific restrictions on semi-automatic rifles.

• Whether this incident justifies new legislation would depend on public and political reactions. Supporters of stricter gun laws may use it to argue for tighter regulations, while opponents might emphasize individual rights and the need for better enforcement of existing laws.

Public Reaction and National Mood:

• Anxiety and Concern: The incident could heighten public anxiety about security and safety, especially at political events and rallies.

• Political Polarization: It might further polarize opinions on issues like gun rights versus gun control, immigration, and national security.

In conclusion, while a near-miss assassination attempt on Trump could have complex effects, including potentially boosting his support among certain segments of the electorate, its broader implications for policy and public sentiment would be highly contingent on how the event is perceived and framed by media, political leaders, and the public at large.

Public perceptions can be manipulated, however, and pushed in a particular direction if there were underlying forces attempting to push a particular agenda. For example, if Trump were the backed nominee for globalist policies, then one could expect MSM, Alternative Media and Social Media to largely back Trump. These would be presented differently. MSM may deride the current Democratic Candidates, while withholding outright support for Trump as their popularity is at all time lows, and their influence waning. Alternative Media could outright back Trump. Social Media as well, and would heavily rely on the use of memes, one of the most successful tools in the Information Operation arsenal.

---

MEMES Thus Far:

UPDATE - MEMES:

---

What News Stories Now Disappear?

In the wake of a near-miss assassination attempt on Trump, the media landscape swiftly pivots to focus intensely on the event, temporarily overshadowing critical global developments and domestic issues:

Domination of News Cycle: The attempted assassination catapults to the forefront of news coverage, dominating headlines and airwaves. Media outlets dissect every detail of the incident, from the circumstances surrounding the attempt to Trump's response and the broader implications for national security.

Positive Coverage for Trump: Trump receives significant and largely sympathetic media attention. Coverage portrays him as a resilient figure facing imminent danger, emphasizing his strength and determination in the face of adversity. This narrative fosters empathy and support among his base and potentially resonates with undecided voters as well.

Shift of Attention: Concurrently, critical global and domestic issues are momentarily relegated to secondary status in the news cycle:

• International Crises: Developments such as the Three Gorges Dam breach in China and its economic implications, escalating conflicts in Europe and the Middle East, and the NATO decision involving nuclear-capable F-16s in Russia's vicinity receive less coverage.

• Economic Challenges: Issues like a faltering economy, high inflation rates, and the repercussions of ongoing wars in the Middle East face diminished media scrutiny.

• Immigration Concerns: The urgency of mass immigration efforts amid potential policy shifts under a Trump presidency temporarily fades from public discourse.

• Health and Safety Issues: Reports on vaccine adverse events, legal battles, and concerns over bird flu outbreaks are momentarily sidelined amidst the intense focus on Trump's safety and security.

• Impact on Policy Discussions: The temporary dominance of the assassination attempt narrative sidelines critical policy debates and discussions on international relations, economic stability, public health crises, and immigration reform. This hiatus in reporting and public discourse could delay urgent actions and decisions needed on these pressing issues.

In summary, while a near-miss assassination attempt on Trump garners extensive positive coverage for him, it also diverts attention away from a range of significant global challenges and domestic concerns, impacting public awareness and policy agendas in the short term.

UPDATE - MISSED NEWS, RNC, OBVIOUS BREADCRUMBS:

---

---

Conclusions:

Based on the events surrounding the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024, several intriguing aspects and questions emerge:

The incident itself, where Trump narrowly escaped with a minor injury while one bystander tragically lost their life and two others were severely wounded, has sparked intense scrutiny. Thomas Matthew Crooks, identified as the assailant, was fatally shot by Secret Service agents. Conflicting reports about Crooks' political affiliation, including a donation history to both liberal and conservative causes, add layers of complexity to the narrative.

The timeline of events leading up to the attack, from Trump's delayed speech to the precise moments of gunfire and subsequent evacuation, underscores both the swift response of security personnel and lingering questions about the adequacy of security measures. The location of the shooter, approximately 150 yards away, raises concerns about how he breached security undetected and was able to position himself within firing range.

Media coverage initially faltered with misreported details about the shooter, highlighting broader challenges in early reporting accuracy during chaotic events. These discrepancies, including erroneous descriptions of the shooter's ethnicity and distance from the rally, underscore the need for rigorous verification in breaking news situations.

The incident's temporary dominance in the news cycle overshadowed critical global and domestic issues, from geopolitical tensions to economic challenges and health crises, prompting reflection on media priorities and public attention span.

The occult dimensions, the preponderance of oddities, and the benefits this will likely have for Trump, with memes already flooding alternative media spaces - coupled with this channel’s four-time prediction of a failed assassination attempt, as well as prior posts showing Trump’s occult ties and Globalist proclivities, may well indicate this was all part of a Globalist Play to ensure a Trump win, with massive support of the American and Global Populations. In effect, Trump may come away with a bit of a mandate, and greater freedom to usher in strict measures as a “strong” president to right a sinking ship. If Trump were a true enemy of the Deep State, why did they use such a poorly trained shooter, and such a young kid from such an obvious position to attempt to kill Trump? Why would they want to make a martyr figure that could galvanize the masses in an uncontrolled direction?

With the above being said, it is also possible that the analysis of this channel, combined with accurate predictive outcomes, may simply be coincidental and nothing more than an attempt to force evidence into a preordained globalist box. There are many unknowns, and no conclusive evidence that this was a staged event.

In conclusion, while the attempted assassination temporarily diverts national focus and sparks intense speculation, it also exposes vulnerabilities in security protocols and highlighted the complexities of modern media coverage in high-stress situations.

Ultimately, only time will tell which conclusion was correct. This channel has been predicting a Trump win for over a year. The confidence interval for this prediction has just gone up.

HOW WILL WE KNOW WHICH TRUMP WE GET?

If Trump is a Globalist, he will win the election and usher in Globalist Policies, which initially may not be obvious. He’d back digital currency (blockchain tech CBDC or otherwise, like Bitcoin), he’d create a massive federal police force, and increase police powers. He’d likely back Israel with a move of the capital to Jerusalem and the building of a Third Temple. He’d push for legislation that would ultimately allow for brain machine interface, AI used more broadly in certain applications, mass surveillance, and Internet controls. Trump would clean house, firing those not loyal to the Globalist mission, although this wouldn’t likely be evident at first.

If Trump is the hero many hope he is, then he may not live to see the election. The election would possibly be stolen, without recourse for a Trump win (as I see a scenario for Trump losing, but still getting into power based on evidence of fraud). Provided Trump survived any further attempts, Trump would fire Globalists and those with Communist Agendas. Trump would work to remove the Central Bank (Federal Reserve) and end all wars. Trump would begin a deportation campaign, but with stringent controls on civil liberties, not allowing for a massive federal police force or new laws or powers, but instead removing the current policy roadblocks that inhibit enforcing current laws. Trump would deregulate further, reduce the overall size of government dramatically, reduce our debt, increase jobs, prosperity - within feasible limits, and work toward enshrining basic human rights.

UPDATE - SPECULATION:

---

Related Posts:

Post 25: Zionists, Freemason & the Khazarian Mafia

Post 53: Is Trump the Antichrist?

Post 58: “God Made Trump” - Subliminal Messaging

Post 75: Is Trump’s Agenda the Globalist Agenda?

---

REFERENCES:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2024/07/14/trump-rally-shooting-timeline/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/07/14/timeline-trump-rally-shooting-butler/74397945007/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/timeline-of-trump-rally-shooting-and-investigation-into-attempted-assassination/ar-BB1pWrfc

https://news.yahoo.com/news/timeline-trump-rally-shooting-015912171.html

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/donald-trump-appeared-to-be-the-target-of-an-assassination-attempt-heres-what-to-know/ar-BB1pWohw

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Security_incidents_involving_Donald_Trump

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/07/14/us/politics/trump-gunman-thomas-crooks.html

https://www.nbcdfw.com/news/national-international/a-fundamental-security-failure-how-did-a-gunman-open-fire-on-a-trump-rally/3591158/

https://www.unilad.com/news/us-news/donald-trump-shooting-witness-warns-security-304586-20240714

https://apnews.com/article/secret-service-trump-rally-4e3415b1461f5acefbc8e1fadad0375b

https://www.secretservice.gov/protection/specialoperations

https://en.as.com/latest_news/what-are-the-security-measures-of-the-secret-service-for-tump-and-bidens-election-rallies-n/

Threats Against Trump:

https://jenniferleclaire.org/articles/donald-trump-assassination-threats-blow-up-twitter/

https://www.northcentralpa.com/news/man-who-made-assassination-threats-sentenced-to-prison/article_d402c364-e2dd-11ee-8c96-ef0adb1c6997.html

https://rumble.com/v4wuuqk-election-deep-dive-w-roger-stone.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/secret-service-paid-over-12-million-for-a-years-protection-of-2-trump-advisers-from-potential-iranian-threats/

https://www.techarp.com/facts/e-jean-carroll-gun-trump-threat/

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/4752022-bbc-host-deletes-joke-biden-trump-murder-mock-critics/

Shooter - Alternative Media:

https://www.wtae.com/article/donald-trump-supporters-protesters-come-out-for-his-first-pittsburgh-events/7479235

https://www.rfsafe.com/maxwell-yearick-the-shooter-under-fbi-radar-and-the-consequences-of-political-rhetoric/

Other:

https://jenniferleclaire.org/articles/donald-trump-assassination-threats-blow-up-twitter/

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-07-14/who-was-the-shooter-at-trump-rally-what-we-know-about-gunman/104096364

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2024/07/14/us/trump-shooting-election

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2024/07/14/assassin-identified-as-thomas-matthew-crooks-20-year-old-from-bethel-park-pennsylvania/

https://www.marca.com/en/lifestyle/us-news/presidential-election/2024/07/14/66934f2546163f48968b4575.html

https://dailynetizen.blog/2024/07/14/thomas-matthew-crooks-linked-to-liberal-causes-identified-as-pres-trumps-failed-assassin/

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/assassin-identified-as-thomas-matthew-crooks/

https://www.ibtimes.sg/thomas-matthew-crooks-gunman-who-tried-assassinate-trump-had-his-head-blown-off-by-secret-75271

https://news.sky.com/story/trump-assassination-attempt-what-we-know-so-far-about-gunman-thomas-matthew-crooks-13177698

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/thomas-matthew-crooks-identified-as-trump-shooter-at-pennsylvania-political-rally/ar-BB1pWUbK

https://www.israelhayom.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Thomas.webp

https://www.gematrix.org/?word=Thomas+Matthew+Crooks

https://web.archive.org/web/20240715000000*/https://nypost.com/2024/07/13/us-news/gunman-behind-attempted-assassination-on-trump-shot-and-killed-by-secret-service-sources/

https://web.archive.org/web/20240714041721/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_shooting_at_a_Donald_Trump_rally

https://web.archive.org/web/20240713222142/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Donald_Trump_Las_Vegas_rally_incident

https://web.archive.org/web/20170212041641/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempted_assassination_of_Donald_Trump